As the client grew after the acquisition, so did their warehouse capacity challenges. Over time, it is common for warehouse picking operations to become burdensome and suboptimal. Typically, we recommend regularly taking a step back to examine your entire picking operation – from order fulfillment to shipping — to make sure you are not wasting funds that could be re-allocated elsewhere.
Before the acquisition, the company had not completed a layout assessment for some time. Our team ran into our first hurdle when we learned our client did not have up-to-date drawings of their warehouse layouts. However, our solutions-oriented focus knew that the right processes start with a good design, so our design team paid a visit to their 10 facilities to map out what was needed from a baseline perspective at each unique facility.
From there, we conducted an inventory profile across our client’s pick locations and SKU order frequency to determine which products should be placed optimally throughout the facility in a future state storage system. Because there was no forecast for the inventory, we had to apply a purchasing model from the company’s history, then configure growth factors into the design.
That type of partnership – one where the client is transparent with their processes and their desire to grow – is ideal for us. The more applicable information we have at our fingertips, the better we can design and optimize our clients’ facilities. Because we had a previous relationship, and our client’s point-of-contact had built a level of trust with our team, we were able to factor in all elements and variables into our supply chain engineering.